Welcome new user! You can search existing questions and answers without registering, but please register to post new questions and receive answers. Note that due to large amounts of spam attempts, your first three posts will be manually moderated, so please be patient.
We have moved to a new forum at http://jevois.usc.edu, please check it out. The forum at jevois.org/qa will not allow new user registrations but is maintained alive for its useful past questions and answers.

User ternenbxkn

Member for: 4 years (since May 12, 2021)
Type: Registered user
Full name:
Location:
Website: http://griffingiph738.almoheet-travel.com/chaco-canyon-the-architectural-heart-of-the-anasazi
About: I rejoice that you are comfortable ignoring the notion that the ethnographic Pueblo is the only location to search for proof of Chaco's socio-political organization. When you think about that social as well as political systems remain in a continuous state of ending up being, it seems a little absurd to anticipate that points have stayed the exact same for 900 years. That type of uniformitarian reasoning is what has provided upstreaming a poor name. That claimed, I think it would be interesting to see an expanded discussion of some of the various other methods ethnohistorians are currently utilizing to access the past utilizing ethnography as an entry point. Mesoamerican scholars are having some success with this; why is it not as common in the Southwest? How does the present political climate for SW archaeology play right into choices to make Chaco look a whole lot like a modern-day pueblo?

Activity by ternenbxkn

Score: 100 points (ranked #307)
Questions: 0
Answers: 0
Comments: 0
Voted on: 0 questions, 0 answers
Gave out: 0 up votes, 0 down votes
Received: 0 up votes, 0 down votes
...